From Meme to Government: The "DOGE"

The stated goal is to revolutionize government efficiency by reducing bureaucracy, eliminating excessive regulations, and restructuring federal agencies. In preliminary discussions, Musk mentioned potential cuts to the federal budget of up to $2 trillion. The department, which will initially act as an advisory body until it receives Congressional approval, has set an ambitious deadline:

This transformation is to be completed by July 4, 2026—the symbolic date of the 250th anniversary of American independence.

DOGE: A Name That Sparks Conversation!

The choice of the acronym DOGE does not go unnoticed. It is interesting to see how a seemingly bureaucratic acronym creates a subtle link between the seriousness of a government initiative and the disruptive innovation of the crypto world.

Elon Musk has a notable history with cryptocurrencies and a particularly personal connection to Dogecoin.

Tesla invested $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, setting a major precedent for corporate crypto adoption. But with Dogecoin, the relationship is even more personal: his tweets have repeatedly influenced the value of the “meme coin,” earning him the nickname “Dogefather.” Tesla has even accepted Dogecoin for certain merchandise, and SpaceX announced the “DOGE-1” mission to the moon, fully paid for in Dogecoin.

This connection has led some observers to speculate about the possible integration of blockchain technologies into the government modernization process, although there are currently no official indications in that regard.

Looking Ahead: What Can We Expect?

Given Musk’s background and his approach to technology, it is reasonable to expect some significant innovations. In addition to blockchain, automation is likely to be central to the transformation. Large-scale implementation of RPA (Robotic Process Automation) systems can be envisioned—similar to those that revolutionized Tesla’s production lines. Standardizing APIs between government agencies appears to be another inevitable step—a paradigm shift that could finally break down the information silos that have long defined public administration.

In the area of security, the challenges will be substantial. The need to protect increasingly interconnected systems is expected to require a complete redesign of national cybersecurity frameworks.

The Contrast with Europe

The comparison between the DOGE approach and the European model deserves careful consideration. While the U.S. is witnessing a “top-down revolution” led by figures from the private tech sector with a clear mandate for global efficiency, Europe’s organizational structure points toward a different approach.

In Germany, responsibilities are spread across several specialized ministries: the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community, the Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport (BMDV), and the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI). Switzerland operates through Digitale Verwaltung Schweiz (DVS), the Swiss digital administration, and the Swiss Informatics Conference. Coordination of digitalization initiatives is handled by various institutions, including the Federal Office of Information Technology, Systems and Telecommunication (BIT) and the Federal Office of Communications (BAKOM), reflecting a federalist approach even in its modernization efforts.

The architecture of these systems—with ministries and agencies specifically focused on digitalization—suggests an approach driven more by digital tools than by the efficiency problem itself. This is more an impression than a certainty, supported by the decision to create departments primarily focused on digital transformation rather than on systemic efficiency improvement.

This pattern is mirrored across much of Europe, where structures are also designed specifically for digitalization. However, organizational fragmentation is not the only obstacle to efficiency. The European regulatory approach, exemplified by the AI Act, may become another hindrance to genuine efficiency gains. While the U.S. is preparing to leverage every available tool, including the most advanced AI, to optimize government processes, Europe must navigate a regulatory framework that, while protecting citizens’ rights, could significantly slow innovation across all sectors.

While the DOGE approach follows a broad optimization mandate in which digitalization is just one of many tools, the European structure appears to propose a path where digitalization is the starting point. It’s important to note that this is an interpretation based on the visible organizational structure, and only time and concrete data will reveal whether this perspective holds true.

In the coming years, the comparison of these different approaches—the problem-driven American revolution and the seemingly tool-driven European evolution—will provide valuable insights into the most effective route to government modernization.

Next newsletter article, week 47:

From Blockchain to BMS Integration-->